Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
International Journal of Damage Mechanics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aglan, H. A.
Right arrow Articles by Fateh, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Fatigue Damage Tolerance of Bainitic and Pearlitic Rail Steels

Heshmat A. Aglan

Department of Mechanical Engineering Tuskegee University, Tuskegee, AL 36088, USA, aglanh{at}tuskegee.edu

Mahmood Fateh

Federal Railroad Administration 1120 Vermont Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20590, USA

The microstructure-properties relationships, fatigue crack growth, and fracture surface morphology of J6 bainitic and premium pearlitic rail steels are studied. Specimens are cut from the middle of each railhead along the longitudinal direction of the rail using electrical discharge machining. Fatigue crack propagation tests are conducted under load control conditions using a servo hydraulic material testing system. A simple form of the fatigue power law is used to rank the fatigue crack growth kinetics of the two materials. The results show that bainitic steel has superior fatigue damage tolerance as represented by the fatigue lifetime, fatigue crack propagation kinetics, and fatigue fracture surface morphological features. Fracture surface analysis of fatigue failed specimens revealed the various mechanisms by which bainitic steel acquired its superior resistance to fatigue crack growth. Bainitic rail steel displayed more ductile fracture features such as tearing, and extensive ridge formation during the stable crack propagation process than pearlitic steel. These features are responsible for the crack deceleration and indicate a considerably high energy consuming process associated with the crack propagation of bainitic steel. Pulled-up pearlitic lamella, limited microcracks, and microvoid coalescence are found on the fracture surface of pearlitic rail steel during the stable crack process. The unstable crack propagation region of bainitic steel exhibits both large and small dimples indicative of high resistance to material separation. On the other hand, cleavage and intergranular separation are associated with the unstable crack region in pearlitic steel.

Key Words: fatigue behavior • bainitic rail steel • pearlitic rail steel • fracture surface morphology

International Journal of Damage Mechanics, Vol. 15, No. 4, 393-410 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1056789506060775
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 International Journal of Damage MechanicsHome page
B.-L. Wang and Y.-W. Mai
Exact and Fundamental Solution for an Anti-plane Crack Vertical to the Boundaries of a Magnetoelectroelastic Strip
International Journal of Damage Mechanics, January 1, 2007; 16(1): 77 - 94.
[Abstract] [PDF]